- Joined
- 24 December 2024
- Posts
- 10,774
- Likes
- 18,655
- Name
- Levina
- Image Editing
- No
Our New GOSH Challenge // The Weekly WET Challenge // The Rainbow Game //

Yes, it will. You know how I know, Chris? Because accidents come in threes. You had three already, so the rest of the year should be good!Not to bring the chat down. My 2026 thus far.
Jan. 2nd -My mom died, she was 83.
Jan. 18 -My wifes dad (my father in law) died, he was 70.
Jan. 18 - Engine went out on my mini van driving my daughter home from hospital. Only 110k miles on the thing.
Hope it gets better....
I very much doubt that. I only have a slim understanding of UK copyright law and even less about US copyright law, but I think it's a pretty universal concept that copyright automatically lies with the creator unless they specifically waive their right to it, or licence use to someone else. Facebook has terms and conditions relating to all sorts of things including photos, but, unless I am mistaken, is to protect themselves; it doesn't make you photos public domain.I thought about that once, I posted a photo from a Cowboy Shooting match on the SASS facebook page, three months later it was published in the SASS Chronicle magazine with no credits. Maybe once a photo is posted on someone's facebook page it becomes their property, I don't know.
But didn't you publish them under a CC license?I very much doubt that. I only have a slim understanding of UK copyright law and even less about US copyright law, but I think it's a pretty universal concept that copyright automatically lies with the creator unless they specifically waive their right to it, or licence use to someone else. Facebook has terms and conditions relating to all sorts of things including photos, but, unless I am mistaken, is to protect themselves; it doesn't make you photos public domain.
Yes, but that doesn't negate my copyright. My copyright still exists and I permit use within the terms of the CC licence, which, like yours, is CC BY-NC-ND. This basically means that I'm happy for people to use my creation, so long as they don't use it commerically, or use it to create further versions. In the case I wrote about above, I was complaining about an unauthorised derivative version. I have just learnt that my complaint has been upheld and the offending creation removed from the web. At least my afternoon wasn't wasted.But didn't you publish them under a CC license?
That's a clear violation of that CC license. I think when somebody does that they expect people to not complain thinking it will be too much of a bother. Good for you for taking them on!I was complaining about an unauthorised derivative version.
Congratulations. Well done.Yes, but that doesn't negate my copyright. My copyright still exists and I permit use within the terms of the CC licence, which, like yours, is CC BY-NC-ND. This basically means that I'm happy for people to use my creation, so long as they don't use it commerically, or use it to create further versions. In the case I wrote about above, I was complaining about an unauthorised derivative version. I have just learnt that my complaint has been upheld and the offending creation removed from the web. At least my afternoon wasn't wasted.![]()
It was indeed a violation, the more so because at that time the image was fully copyrighted, so although they did credit me they had no right to use that image without my consent. Although I'm not sure you can really say they used it commercially. Yes, it was in a newspaper but on the lifestyle pages as an illustration of what was said in the article. However, I did look into it, but the Pravda in Ukraine? How do you do that? Had it been used in the US or the UK or a country in the EU I would've taken action, but it really was too much of a bother to pursue this so I just shrugged it off.In your case, I would have thought that Pravda were using your image for commercial purposes (generating sales) and should have sought your permission. Probably a minefield though.
Yeah, policing the whole world is an impossibility. Even the tangerine cry-baby can't do it (though he seems to think he can).It was indeed a violation, the more so because at that time the image was fully copyrighted, so although they did credit me they had no right to use that image without my consent. Although I'm not sure you can really say they used it commercially. Yes, it was in a newspaper but on the lifestyle pages as an illustration of what was said in the article. However, I did look into it, but the Pravda in Ukraine? How do you do that? Had it been used in the US or the UK or a country in the EU I would've taken action, but it really was too much of a bother to pursue this so I just shrugged it off.
Another one is used on a travel site in Indonesia so you could say it is used commercially but I shrugged that off too. I mean, Indonesia?
i am so sorry for your losses and troubles.Not to bring the chat down. My 2026 thus far.
Jan. 2nd -My mom died, she was 83.
Jan. 18 -My wifes dad (my father in law) died, he was 70.
Jan. 18 - Engine went out on my mini van driving my daughter home from hospital. Only 110k miles on the thing.
Hope it gets better....
i thought you played some Chickenfoot music.I played Chickenfoot (a domino game) today with the ladies at the Senior Citizens Center. I actually won a game. First time in forever that I actually won.
I'm sorry for your losses. It's a sad start of this year for you.Not to bring the chat down. My 2026 thus far.
Jan. 2nd -My mom died, she was 83.
Jan. 18 -My wifes dad (my father in law) died, he was 70.
Jan. 18 - Engine went out on my mini van driving my daughter home from hospital. Only 110k miles on the thing.
Hope it gets better....
We need to set essential cookies to make the site work.
External hosts may want to set additional cookies for viewing their content.
These cookies are optional and can be turned on and off at any time.
